For years now I have not turned to the radio or television to look for
any music, but the media industry is such that it can reach you
virtually anywhere. Evanescence's hit singles "Going Under" and "Bring
Me to Life" have received more airplay than most in recent months (at
least in Portugal), thus becoming two of the songs to reach me in
spite of my "musical spam filter". So why did I go through the trouble
of hearing the entirety of their disc and writing a review for CoC
when they're already all over MTV and such? The reason is twofold:
one -- and note that this isn't saying much -- their hit singles
actually have enough quality to justify a second glance, much to the
contrary of the rest of their ilk that I'm aware of (most certainly
including labelmates Drowning Pool and Creed); two, they have irked me
in an entirely different manner than their peers.Evanescence build their nu metal-ish sound around the vocals of the
talented Amy Lee, who describes their music as "epic, dramatic, dark
rock". She goes on about their homeland Arkansas in the group's
official biography: "It's typically death metal or really soft,
older-people music there -- I don't even know of any local bands that
have female singers." However, Evanescence ought to know that the
world does not end in Little Rock, Arkansas, or even the United
States. In Europe, metal bands have been successfully incorporating
various amounts of female vocals into their sound since the mid-'90s.
What Evanescence have done is simply take that contrasting blend of
female vocals and heavy music and give it a commercial, nu metal
treatment that hugely boosts the band's marketability. This leads me
to the way Evanescence have specifically irked me: the vocal style and
some of the guitar riffs on _Fallen_ bear more than a passing
resemblance to a simplified version of Norway's Madder Mortem, whose
vastly superior work easily predates Evanescence's -- and the same can
be said about some of the softer tracks on the album compared to The
Gathering. Yet whose is the public success, whose the financial gain?
Ultimately, it's the music industry and its marketing machine that
continue to dictate the results, because most people simply can't be
arsed to look for the better band.
So, how good is _Fallen_ then? Having already said Evanescence deserved a
second glance much more than their labelmates and other such peers, I
must nonetheless point out the often repetitive choruses, bland guitar
and drum sound, poor riffs, occasionally silly male vocal patterns
coupled with weak delivery, and the general commercial take to their
music as negative factors. Which is quite a lot when you look at it,
much as it still isn't as bad as their competition. Truth be told,
Amy Lee's vocals are responsible for about three fourths of my rating
-- not because they are particularly amazing, but because the rest is
rather mediocre. The remainder of the album actually tends to be
somewhat less nu metal and Madder Mortem-ish, at times becoming more
melancholic and keyboard-based and bringing to mind The Gathering in
some of those occasions. Unfortunately, things never get very
remarkable in any way apart from the couple of overplayed choruses
from their singles -- we've all heard the slower piano tracks
somewhere before, and even the attempted symphonic edge of closing track
"Whisper" reeks of things that have been done much better by metal
bands years ago.
Those into bands like Madder Mortem or The Gathering who like
Evanescence's singles enough could do worse than give _Fallen_ a try;
but do not expect it to be anywhere nearly as good as those bands, or
as catchy as the singles. For me, this brief excursion out of the
underground is over, and served only to remind me how great music can
be down here.